Welcome TOMPAINE members!
Comments: 3 (click
to view) Addendums:
1
I want to
personally thank those of you who are visiting DeKalb
County Online on the recommendation of TOMPAINE List
Owner, Dr. Herbert J. Rubin.
I've enjoyed
reading the TOMPAINE archives for a couple of years now.
I'm not an NIU staff member so I can't participate in
your discussions but I do find them interesting.
Dr. Rubin
believes I attacked TOMPAINE (see index page of this
site). I believe I am attacking Dr. Rubin's public
attack of the City of DeKalb's website and his thinly
veiled partisan attack on Greg Sparrow. Dr. Rubin and I
seldom agree on anything.
For those
of you who are totally confused as to what is going on
here, please read Dr. Rubin's post on TOMPAINE and
follow the unedited string of electronic conversation
between Dr. Rubin and I:
FROM
TOMPAINE:
Spillover
from city politics
Subject: Spillover from city politics
From: Herbert Rubin (email address
omitted)
Date: Fri Feb 11 2005 - 20:57:18 CST
As a
spillover from city politics, Mac Macintyre who runs his
own web site and works for the Developer's Association
(and is on the other side of most city political issues
from me) has attacked tompaine. (In a letter to the
local paper I dared to imply that the city web site
might be slanted toward the mayor; admittedly though
that it might simply be having some technical problems).
In any case Mac attacked. You can see his comments on
http://www.dekalbcounty-il.com/
I also
wrote him a strong letter that I'm including below:
(Oh the
phrase 'rant page' is not me being nasty; it's what Mac
calls his page)
editor's
note: Dr. Rubin's strong letter is included by order of
which it was received in the following emails we
exchanged. He had originally requested that our
conversation be considered private but has since changed
his mind.
-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert Rubin
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:51 PM
To: Mac McIntyre
Cc: Herbert Rubin
Subject: Your tompaine comments
Mac
In case you
do still feel politics requires some semblance of
fairness, you might want to rethink your comments on
tompaine on your personally controlled website. .You
might want to note that tompaine is totally
unmonitored. I have only two responsibilities for it.
First, to try to handle the technical foulups that occur
on any list; i.e. helping people subscribe, figuring
out what to do when the list server is acting funny.
Second, to double check when people subscribe that they
are neither faculty or staff or administrators, present
or retired, at the university (with one or two
exception who were grandfathered early on).
Unlike the
control you maintain on your rant page (in which you do
seem fair enough in posting people's reactions, but
still it is your page) I have no content control
whatsoever over tompaine. I do post on my own but as
participant not as someone controlling the list.
Mac, when
you attacked me on your web page for my political
activities and views on growth, I thought the attack was
a bit unfair, but still politics are politics and I am
an actor in city politics. Tompaine was set up as a
substitute for a non-existing faculty and staff club on
campus with conversations ranging from silly jokes, to
some hard nosed national political discussions just as
they would at lunch.
Attacking
tompaine is not quite like attacking a politician's
family (rather than the politician himself or herself)
but comes pretty close. I think you are being very
unfair this time and I would appreciate it if you
would confine attacks to areas in which we disagree in
city politics, not just make shot gun attacks.
Everything I do is not political; I work out, watch a
wide variety of classical movies; photograph birds;
and, fix (or try to fix) problems that occur on
tompaine.
Incidentally, even the city manager of DeKalb admits
that there are technical problems with the web site,
problems that I believe are being resolved because of
pressure from folk like myself. I would have thought you
would have joined in on demanding that the city web site
works well. (It has improved this week, but from
January 24th until a day or two ago was virtually
useless). The last problem I found was a 23 meg download
of a pdf file (just think what that would do to a modem
user). You are a web designer yourself and I hope have
sufficient pride not to open up a site with obvious
technical defects. For well over a week, only the
mayor's page was functioning.
Herb Rubin

From:
Herbert Rubin
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:51 PM
To: Mac McIntyre
Cc: Herbert Rubin
Subject: Your tompaine comments
Mac,
the phrase should be either faculty or staff (not
neither) I elided two phrases, sorry
herb

From:
Mac McIntyre
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:04 PM
To: 'Herbert Rubin'
Subject: RE: Your tompaine comments
Herb,
Your public attack on the city website implied
partisanship and that is unfair to the public and
whoever works on the city website. Your letter was a
thinly disguised attack on Sparrow and being less than
honest in stating your intent and purpose when making
public statements is unfair.
You have three responsibilities with TomPaine. The two
you mentioned plus you are responsible for what you post
on it. If you are going to transparently accuse and vent
against others for partisanship, for the purpose of
playing political games with Sparrow, then the public
should be allowed to read your two posts in the current
tompaine archive about DeKalb politics so that they may
conclude whether or not you are practicing partisanship.
<<<<About TOMPAINE Discussion List (owner: Herb Rubin)
TOMPAINE is a discussion group for faculty and staff
members of the NIU Community. TOMPAINE provides a forum
for members of the NIU community to share their insights
on events affecting the university as a place of work
and as an institution of higher education. The
discussion group is meant to be the electronic
substitute for a university club at which conversations
between those in different fields and disciplines can
take place.>>>>
The above is what I thought the purpose of TOMPAINE is.
Based on the frequency and amount of donations NIU
receives from current and former staff members there
should not be a need for an electronic substitute for a
university staff club. There ought to be room in one of
the projects going up around Barsema to accommodate
that.
If you perceive an attack on TOMPAINE as akin to
attacking a politician's family then perhaps the site is
'your baby.' Being a website designer I can then have
compassion for its webmaster as well as the IT
department and how they must have felt when you trashed
their work and accused them of partisanship.
FYI there are occasions that require a site to be in the
non-functioning position the city site was in. Granted,
they should have put a noticeable notice on the index or
default page that told people technical problems
existed. I do try to avoid such situations but when you
add javascript-based drop down menus to an existing site
you have to do it hot otherwise you will lose critical
head file tags and command scripts. I have learned to
stay away from such navigation structure especially on
an existing website.
As local government websites go, it is a toss-up between
the City of DeKalb and the DeKalb County government site
as to which is the best in the county. The city does not
have highly qualified website programmers on their staff
and I admire them for trying to save the taxpayers money
and do their work in house.
I would be happy to make a public retraction for my
comments if I can expect the same from you.
Mac
PS: I assumed this was meant to be private, if not
advise.

Reader Comments:
Date: Sunday
February 13, 2005
Time: 06:02 PM -0500
Comment:
Mac,
You are a webmaster who should know the difference between
public and private correspondence. We were carrying out a
private discussion. You have posted it on a public web page.
That is against electronic matters.
On your own web page you do distinguish between public and
private comments. You certainly should respect those
differences when the correspondence is private.
Mac I offered to let you post on tompaine if you wished. I
did NOT offer to make our discussion public.
You and I have had many civil disagreements. I participate
in them especially those in the local paper because I feel
through such discussions we all learn.
Taking a private correspondence and posting it on the web is
not a civil respondence and makes me rethinking whether or
not you and I can have discussions.
Please remove the private correspondence
Herb Rubin
editor's response:
Herb, per your request I removed email correspondence
between you and I that you have since indicated were meant
to be private. I encourage you to continue using the form
provided below in any future correspondence you wish to have
with me. I have never and will never post a comment marked
private. If you send email directly to me I may not know
your intentions regarding the public or private nature of
its content.
I originally thought you wanted a private conversation with
me, but was not sure, as the above postcript in my reply
indicated. But I noticed that you posted your "strong
letter" on TOMPAINE on Feb. 11th. That led me to believe
that you wanted public dialogue.
DeKalb County Online is a local "newspaper," sort of, and
it's locally and independently owned and operated. I
encourage you to continue public dialogue on community
matters here.
As for your offer to let me post on TOMPAINE. Thank you.
I've read a few posts from you and your colleagues there
that are in response to this issue. Based on those comments
I do not know if I am intelligent enough to respond there.
Oh, well. I can always respond here.
Mac McIntyre
DeKalb County Online

Date:
Monday February 14, 2005
Time: 01:09 PM -0500
Comment:
Mac,
And, I have checked the public comment box here but not for
any continuation of this discussion if you should write me
privately. In fact, I am now very reluctant to write to you
at all, even though and even in spite of our sharp
disagreements I have learned from what you say about some
very different pespectives.
I was not complaining about the public post of my first
response to your 'rant' on me. You and I exchanged another
private series of letters on this topic and you did start to
publish them; while there is nothing I'm ashamed of in these
private correspondence, private is private and public is
public. My post to tompaine was simply a copy of the public
letter I sent to you with a tiny bit of background. That's
why i offered you the opportunity to post on tompaine so you
can argue against my description of the background. Other
than that all correspondence was private.
Tompaine is a unmoderated forum with a name that clearly
indicates its purpose. I know that your site (which i think
technically is a good site) is that of a private business
person. But still using names like dekalbcounty-Il.com would
make a google searcher think the site was official. Remember
a few years back when some troubled person used a name very
much like the cityofdekalb to post some awful junk about
dekalb or the police (I don't remember the details). This
person I believe was accused to trying to deceive I know you
are not doing this, but still having a site name that has in
the county name can confuse.
Perhaps you might want to have some banners on the top pages
of your site to indicate that the site itself is strictly a
private venture. I know a reader can find this information
if he or she looksl but I think it should be made very
clear.
And, thanks for promising to remove my posts, though I think
the second one is still up and you only had permission for
the first.
Incidentally, you need to set up a better system to
distinguish private and public posts. Your system for the
initial post is fine, but then when you wrote me back
privately or so it appeared there was no indication
whatsoever that we were having an on-line discussion rather
than the private discussion I thought we were having and
which we have had before.
Herb Rubin
RESPONSE:
Differences, no matter how sharp, are productive if
something is learned from airing them. I, too, do learn from
our discussions.
This discussion has challenged my ability to determine what
emails are meant to be private and which are meant to be
public. You checked the box on this one, indicating public
intent, but in your first line indicated maybe you did not
mean that. So I apologize for the delay. I hope this is the
letter you are referring to that you wanted public. If not
please advise.
As for my choice for the URL address of this website. I
purchased the URL in 1996 and came on line with it in May of
1997. I guess I will just have to live with the notion that
you believe I am being deceitful because I am not going to
change the URL. You can also reach the site using the
address of dekalbcountyonline.com. I strongly urge anyone
who uses the Internet not to rely on an URL address as a
source of credibility. Once again, the only thing this site
officially is, is mine.
I think the spoof site you are referring to was
dekalbcity.com. It attacked Greg Sparrow and just about any
police officer. One of its major contributors was a guest
contributor on TOMPAINE a while back. I fully support your
policy that only NIU staff and retirees post on your forum.
And so I will not post on TOMPAINE. I will, however, reserve
and exercise my right to copy, post and respond to any
comment on that discussion board that contains or refers to
my name.

Date: Tuesday
February 15, 2005
Time: 01:38 AM -0500
Comment:
Amazing that Rubin, et al., have time to mess around with a
newsgroup on our taxpayer time/dollars--how about a
suggestion for Rubin: set-up your website/newsgroup on your
own nickel. You have every right to express yourself--just
do it on your own funds and time (not my hard earned
taxpayer dollars that are going to fund your salary and the
NIU).

ADDENDUM
1
While I will gladly accept criticism regarding my "net
ethics" I will also defend my right to express my opinion.
The following are posts made on TOMPAINE that my name
appears in along with my responses to those posts. I support
TOMPAINE's policy that only members and retired members of
NIU's staff are allowed to post messages on its discussion
board.

I've now read
McIntyre's statement about TP. My reaction? The parallel
McIntyre draws between his private site and TP is
informative of what he
thinks of universities. Like so many on the Right (e.g.,
Limbaugh,
Hannity, O'Reilly), McIntyre does not seem to recognize an
open forum
even when he sees one. Is it possible that those on the
Right appreciate
free and open discussion -- i.e., debate open to
unrestricted challenge
-- as little as they understand and appreciate freedom of
speech in
general (e.g., flag burning) and academic freedom in
particular (e.g.,
the current reaction to Ward Churchhill)?
Bob Suchner
RESPONSE: Actually, I think NIU is one of the best
universities in the nation and is so in large part due to
its staff. I also believe NIU is a wonderful asset for the
community and that Dr. Peters is the best President NIU has
had since I've lived here (since 1968). Thanks for taking
the time to spell my name correctly and with more than four
letters.

[McIntyre] is
very conservative. I don't mind it when he fairly attacks me
politically. I believe in fiscally responsible, moderated
growth. He
believes in rapid growth and does work for the developers'
association. our interests differ.
I do get
angry at his name calling argumentation. On one occasion he
attacked my signature block. On another, when I was
presenting a
statistical argument, he attacked by saying Herb Rubin has
degrees in
mathematics (that's true) so you should NOT trust his
numbers (that
puzzled).
Anyway, I
didn't want to start a thread on this one. I just wanted
people
to be aware of how my active role in town politics has been
by inadvertence (or perhaps malice) spilled over to
tompaine.
Two asides:
Once again I'm very pleased by our initial decision not to
monitor tompaine for content. If universities cannot
maintain open
discussion lists, who the heck can?
Second aside:
: the city web site that had been non-functioning for close
to 2 weeks (except for a page that the mayor wrote) is
now rapidly returning to functionality. I think it is
interesting that the return occurred only after I wrote my
letter to the chronicle and after myself and many others
called up city hall to complain.
Herb Rubin
RESPONSE: I am fiscally conservative, socially liberal.
Someone posted a link to a political test on TOMPAINE a
while back. I clicked the link, answered the questions on
the test and scored a direct bull's eye, right in the
center.
You once used your signature block as an introduction to a
letter to the editor (Daily Chronicle). The Chronicle
referenced the quote to an Anonymous source. I pointed out
that the source was Fanon and explained who Fanon was.
I believe the quote related to your degrees was: Herb Rubin
has a PhD in sociology and a Masters in mathematics. It was
in response to a letter in which you attacked me, implying
that my statistics should not be trusted because I "work for
the developers."
<<the city
web site that had been non-functioning for close to 2
weeks (except for a page that the mayor wrote) is now
rapidly returning to functionality.>>
That is grossly and deliberately inaccurate. I monitor the
city website on an almost daily basis to stay informed of
city news, meetings and issues. It has been functioning at a
restrictive level due to site redesign. At no time during
the two or three week period has "only the mayor's page
worked." One other functioning page, available from the
Welcome Page of the site says:
City of DeKalb redesigns it's website.
January 24th, 2005
This is the first major redesign of the website since it's
creation in February, 2001. Our website has had almost a
quarter of a million visits in its first four years. We
hope you find the new design easier and more enjoyable to
use to get the information you are looking for. Throughout
the renewal process we have kept in mind ease of navigation,
quick page download times, and providing the information
that our visitors are looking for in a more "user friendly"
environment.
We do ask your patience in the fact that this new site will
not be 100% accessible for the next few days, as we go
through the process of removing the old site, and posting
the new one. As you browse our site, you may notice links
and pages that are not available. We are aware of this, and
again, it is all part of the updating process.
In the meantime, should you have any suggestions, ideas, or
comments on our new look, please feel free to let us know by
clicking the link at the bottom of the page and send your
thoughts to the webmaster.
Again, thank you for your patience during this process, and
we hope you visit us again soon.
City of DeKalb-
Webmaster

[McIntyre's]
argument seems based, in part, on a stunning ignorance of
the difference between a government-maintained homepage and
a
government-owned communal gather spot, such as London's Hyde
Park. Whether intended as disingenuous rhetorical ploy or
the result of
techno-cluelessness, his comments are consistent with other
right-wingers who attempt to stifle free speech.
[McIntyre]
apparently isn't aware that a discussion board is just that.
A discussion board. People express opinions. They discuss
opinions.
[McIntyre's] argument suggests that he would close down a
forum if some of the discussion includes political speech
not to his liking. The
implication that, because Tompaine is "tax-payer funded,"
NIU
administrators should close it down. Would he also close
down tax-payer
funded roads on which his political opponents travel? The
computer
services (like other infrastructure) are a conduit over
which ideas
travel. [McIntyre] would close the roads to limit the spread
of ideas to
which he objects.
[McIntyre's]
characterization of Tompaine is not only irresponsibly
erroneous, it's dangerous. The conservative right has been
making a
concerted effort to stifle "leftist" and "partisan" thought
at Universities. Whether [McIntyre] is part of this neocon
campaign is irrelevant: His misrepresentation of Tompaine is
used to justify his implied call to close it down. There's
enough of this "silence the opposition" nonsense, and it's
sad to see [McIntyre] as a participant in it.
Jim Thomas
RESPONSE: So, unless I agree with you I am a neocon or even
further radically to the right?

Mac
[McIntyre], the webmaster of what would appear to be an
"official"
county-sponsored website but--according to the information
there--is
actually a private page designed to appear official--has
issues with
the TomPaine discussion group. This would give the page
credibility
that it doesn't, in fact, have. Worse, he is using his forum
to attack TomPaine, using fallacious arguments to suggest
that NIU consider
pulling the plug.
He has
suggested that NIU should consider "unplugging TomPaine"
until
partisanship is removed. In addition, he has posted Herb's
private email
on his public forum, something that--as a "webmaster," he
knows is a
serious violation of Net ethics.
http://www.dekalbcounty-il.com/welcometompainemembers.htm
[McIntyre's]
actions, whether so-intended or not, are among those that
create a chilling effect on free speech, academic freedom,
and "community
building" (which, ironically, [McIntyre's] site alleges to
foster).
Several
issues are at stake here:
1) In the
current climate of attempts by the "right" to stifle
academic
speech with which they disagree, attempts on an seemingly
official page
under the auspices of DeKalb County are dangerous. TomPaine
is a forum
for a free-flow of ideas, and there have been contentious
discussions
here on a variety of issues. Passion = partisanship.
[McIntyre's] call
to "pull the plug" would silence discussion.
2) [McIntyre]
has linked the most recent TomPaine archives on his
homepage. While legitimate, he appears to think it's
"evidence" of TP partisanship. Even a cursory reading of the
archives he provides is evidence of the opposite: People
here speak their minds, reflecting a diversity of views. To
call TP "partisan" and suggest that the plug be pulled
because it exists to espouse a specific partisan position is
absurd.
3)
[McIntyre], judging from his posts on his homepage (see URL
above),
seems unable to distinguish between a homepage with an
official
imprimatur, such as his, and a discussion forum (an
e-discussion group,
a meeting hall, or the BlackHawk), that--while "supported by
tax-payer
money"--are designed for interaction. Following this logic,
no instructor
opinions could be voiced in class that reflected
"partisanship," conversations on campus property should be
restricted to neutral topics,
and the free-flow/give-and-take of debate and differences of
opinion would be forbidden.
4)
[McIntyre's] posts on his homepage argue that, because there
are
partisan views expressed on TomPaine that are stored on the
archives,
and because Herb's posts are among these archives, TomPaine
is
therefore partisan. I'll leave the non sequitor for others
to parse,
but the subtext is that discussions on NIU servers that
reflect a position
others might not share are not suitable for archiving. By
extension, this
would mean that classroom discussion lists, which include a
variety of
positions, should also be "unplugged." Given the current
climate in
which academic freedom is under attack by the right, this
type of
argument should be challenged firmly and unequivocally.
If the
[McIntyre]/Herb debate were simply a matter of differing
political
ideas, there would be no problem. But, his unapologetic call
for
NIU to "pull the plug" on TomPaine is an irresponsible
exercise, and that
it's posted on what appears to be an official DeKalb County
site is
a dangerous and demagogic incitement to those who might
actually give
credence to his suggestion.
Given the
recent flap over Kurapos, Churchill, the Pope Foundation,
the "Academic Bill of Rights" pushed by neocons, this issue
isn't
what views and positions we teach and discuss, but whether
we will
be able to.
Jim Thomas
RESPONSE: DeKalb County Online is not the official website
to anything connected to any governmental unit or any public
or private organization. It is my private venture, has been
online since 1997, and sometime today, Feb 14th, it will
have its 100,000th site visitor since Jan. 1, 2005. I do not
pretend or promote that it is any type of official site.
Please don't tell me that you wish to see my rights as a
business owner curtailed or my rights to free speech
censored?
Satirically speaking, if I was a member of TOMPAINE, and we
were members of a baseball team and told to play in the
outfield, it would appear that Gilbert Sebenste would be the
right fielder, all by himself. I would be in center field,
with little competition. And the rest of you would be all
ganged up in left field, probably complaining about the
injustices of having to share playing time. Of course, I
know Herb is not much into sports, so I suspect he would be
sitting somewhere left of the left field foul pole.
I did remove, per Herb's request, emails that he said he did
not intend to be made public. Based on what I have read on
TOMPAINE I thought he intended to carry on a public debate.
I found it interesting that he would publish his "strong
letter" on Tom Paine without my response. Censorship? You
decide. I certainly do not want to become the target of some
Electronic Matters Department investigation, if one exists.
Actually, I really enjoy TOMPAINE. It sometimes challenges
my critical thinking (you should try it sometime). It
sometimes informs me as to NIU and community issues that I
have interest in. It's almost always entertaining.
And I am NOT attacking TOMPAINE. I am not attacking Herb
Rubin personally. But I am attacking his political strategy
of knit-picking and attacking city employees and whoever
else works on the city's website with the subliminal
motivation of working to elect Frank Van Buer (more
accurately, to unseat Greg Sparrow). He should be up front
in stating his intent and more considerate of others.

I note that
[McIntyre] is not only posting private email without
permission, but he is reproducing the posts on Tompaine
without
permission as content for his admittedly commercial
enterprise. While it is acceptable to link commentary to
public pages, porting over several long complete posts with
neither the author's knowledge nor permission is not. The
length moves them beyond fair use, and he is profiting from
the controversy he is stirring up.
Further,
although he acknowledges in posts that his site is for his
own commercial gain and not an official page of DeKalb
County, this is hardly clear from the page.
[McIntyre's]
lack of ethics, and possible violation of copyright, are
troublesome, especially given his public suggestion that
Tompaine be unplugged.
Perhaps his
actions are those of simple ignorance, perhaps not. But, he
seems to have used his political disagreements with Herb to
create a controversy in which his actions reflect a lack
both of integrity, courtesy, and basic common sense.
This is
hardly the way that one who professes to build bridges is
expected to act.
Jim Thomas
RESPONSE: There is certainly a need for Net ethics and
perhaps an Electronic Matters Department should be formed.
Maybe an impact fee on each new website could produce the
funding. Based on your opinion of me I would not be suitable
material for employment at that agency.
I suppose I should hurl insults your way but this is a
family site, sort of, so I would never stoop so low as to
call you a four letter name like capitalist.
If you think I have violated a copyright law, you should sue
me. I hear you can really make out on those kind of things.
But, I will continue to post, verbatim, any link from
TOMPAINE that contains my name or refers to me. And I will
respond to those posts here. I support the policy at
TOMPAINE that only NIU staff members and retirees post to
that forum.
The legitimate criticism that you have of me regards my
ignorance. I tried to be clever and use satire to make a
point. It is my responsibility to make sure the reader
understands my use of satire and I failed in fulfilling that
responsibility.
It was with satire that I suggested pulling the plug on
TOMPAINE.
ADDENDUM
2
The following
statement was made on the welcome page of this site. It
started this whole thing. The author, who wishes to remain
anonymous and so I will only publish his initials: Mac
McIntyre
Dr. Herb Rubin, professor
emeritus (NIU), is demanding
that the City of DeKalb unplug
its website until "partisanship"
is removed. He believes
taxpayers should not foot the
bill for such a website. He
believes the website favors
incumbent DeKalb mayor, Greg
Sparrow.
See website.
Dr. Rubin, an avid member of the
anti-Sparrow club, maintains a
list serve website called
TomPaine that is taxpayer
supported (it's on an NIU
server) that is about as
partisan as one could get.
See website.
Perhaps Dr. Rubin, or NIU, would
consider unplugging TomPaine
until such partisanship is
removed?
ADDENDUM
3
Several readers have asked why
Dr. Rubin and I just don't run
for Mayor. Dr. Rubin has told me
that he briefly entertained the
idea. I've thought about running
for U.S. President but never
Mayor of DeKalb. Being the
astute politician that I am, I
quickly ordered a study to
determine my chances in a
head-to-head match-up with Dr.
Rubin. A very scientific poll
was conducted by the independent
research firm, MAI, Inc. The
results of that poll, with a
margin error of 0% are indicated
below:
Dr. Herb Rubin: 00000
Mac McIntyre:

If you would like to vote in
this poll click on the name you
are voting for below:
I
vote for
Mac McIntyre
I
vote for
Dr. Herbert J. Rubin