Education Week, a newspaper published by the non-profit
organization
Editorial Projects in Education, Inc., gives Illinois’
public education an A- rating in accountability. So how can
anyone be critical of school finance?
When 80
percent of the school districts in Illinois are in deficit
spending perhaps such a high rating on accountability is based
on the Bell Curve. Or perhaps it should be assumed and accepted
that all spending increases must be met with increased funding
(taxes).
State
funding of education in Illinois has been increasing at an
average rate of 6-7% annually in the past decade (more than the
rate of inflation). But the public perception is state funding
has consistently been decreasing. In DeKalb County the state
share of public education costs runs from 15%-40% depending on
the district. In comparison, the funding from Springfield is
more than 51% of the cost of many private schools in Illinois.
If the state does not increase funding to meet the school
districts’ increase in spending then it is portrayed as a
decrease.
Superintendent
salaries are skyrocketing. Sycamore school superintendent,
Robert Hammon, received a more than
49% increase in salary from 1998-2003. Former DeKalb
superintendent Brian Ali received a pay
increase of almost 55% from 1999-2003. But those increases
are smaller than those received by superintendents in
communities to the east. At New Trier Township Henry Bangser’s
salary increased by $130,134 from 1998-2003 – an 82% raise.
The Miami-Dade County school
district in Florida in recent times arranged to help then
incoming Superintendent Rudolph F. Crew get a home loan backed
by private donations that would pay the mortgage holder back a
full quarter of the loan in each of his first four years. The
contract paid him $295,000 in his first year, plus the chance to
earn another $50,000 each year in bonuses. It also pays for a
new car every two years, specified as "a Crown Victoria or
comparable vehicle."
William J. Attea, of Hazard, Young,
Attea & Associates Ltd., one of the country’s largest
superintendent-search firms, based in Glenview, Ill. told the
Miami press of the 400 searches the company has conducted since
1987 none has involved such an arrangement. He told them he
understood why some districts might feel pressed to consider
going beyond even public dollars to recruit a leader. "What the
public wants is they want million-dollar talent to take the job
for $100,000," he told the media, "and it’s not going to happen
in this day and age."
His firm was hired by the DeKalb
School District to find current superintendent Paul Beilfuss,
after they were hired by the Kankakee School District to find
Brian Ali. According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Beilfuss
received a half-year's salary, $74,207, when he resigned from
Wayzata School District to take the DeKalb job. He had accrued
142 unused vacation and sick days, which earned him an
additional $94,343 on leaving, for a total payout of $168,550
minus any vacation time he may have taken. That’s not a bad
bonus for finding a better paying job.
Teachers have not fared as well as
administrators when it comes to pay raises. Yet their increases
are often much higher than the public perceives them to be. When
new contracts are approved the media often only reports
increases in the base contract pay failing to include seniority
and education step raises.
In 41 states, teacher strikes are
illegal but Illinois is not one of them. There is perhaps no
greater pressure on an elected volunteer school board member
than the threat of a strike. But it is the disparity in
professional expertise and resources between the national unions
and local school boards that pose the greatest challenge in
collective bargaining – in relation to the tax payer.
In August 2001 the DeKalb teachers
approved their new contract. The five year deal called for 5%
increases in base pay in its first two years and 4.5% for the
final three years of the contract. The base contract pay raise,
not including seniority and education step raises, was about
twice the rate of inflation.
Negotiating teams from the district and the administration
employed a negotiation process known as "interest-based
bargaining" (IBB). IBB was developed from a Harvard research
project, and is described as a focus on reaching consensus on
mutual interests. Education is a mutual interest along with
salary. Two days of training was made possible with the
assistance of Bob Peickert, area representative for the Illinois
Federation of Teachers Union; Doug Long, superintendent of the
Thorton Fractional school district; and Anthony Ficarelli,
attorney for the DeKalb School District. Board members,
administrators and teachers who participated in the negotiations
all commented on how enjoyable the experience was.
School
districts frequently offer their superintendents, and sometimes
other administrators and teachers, raises of up to 20 percent in
the last year to three years before retirement. Pensions are
calculated by taking the average of the highest four consecutive
years of a contract, so high raises at the end of a career mean
better retirement pay. Teachers and often administrators receive
retirement bonuses as early as 55 years of age that is then
calculated into the salary average used to determine pension
amounts.
The
Teachers Retirement System (TRS), funds pensions of teachers and
administrators for all Illinois districts except the Chicago
Public Schools. TRS paid about $2 billion in benefits during the
2002-2003 fiscal year. As of December, 2003, TRS had nearly $30
billion in assets. If all eligible employees retired now TRS
could not pay for all their benefits. The number of teachers and
administrators retiring will accelerate each year through 2009
as the baby boomers pass through the system.
School
administrators use a flawed finance system called budget
financing that is driven in large part by cost comparison
analysis, or what other communities pay. This year-to-year
financing does not anticipate nor plan for long term needs.
Budget financing creates an urgency to spend whatever is
budgeted or risk having that line item in the budget reduced in
the next fiscal year. Staff is therefore discouraged, by the
nature of the system, from reducing costs.
Comparison analysis leads to irresponsible cost determinations.
For example, DeKalb School Board President, Tom Teresinski, says
that it costs around $22,000 per student to build a new school.
Luke Glowiak, Sycamore School District assistant superintendent
of business affairs, says is costs around $13,000 per student to
build a school. Why is it so much cheaper to build a school in
Sycamore than it is in DeKalb? How often are what communities
west of DeKalb County pay compared to those in the affluent
suburbs? What consideration is given to how much local residents
can afford?
School
districts should be guided by and held accountable to long term
financial planning created and managed by experts, not
volunteers. Until then whatever the tax payers pay, regardless
of their ability to pay those taxes, will be spent. And the
State share will never catch up.